Score: 9

"good"

submission: Little Kim Jong-il

date: November 23, 2006

It was put together well, but the lip synch was pretty bad. Bla bla bla
Commentary
Etc.

9/10

Score: 7

"Haha I killed you?"

submission: All NG Fads Die!!! 5!!!

date: November 3, 2006

The quality of the graphics were very convincing, and the style was usually slick. But the strange part is the humor was very dull. I had expected a character here and there to say this or do that, but they usually did/said something much duller. Eg. the army sniper part. I think the flash would have been perfect if the animations had fewer motionless scenes (or shorter) and better lines.

Score: 10

"To the last commenter"

submission: Ninja vs. Robot (Battle)

date: October 8, 2006

I don't understand people like you. What does it matter what type of style the artist is using? He can't just appeal to every one of your "distinct" tastes all at the same time. I hate people like you. You give a bad score to someone because they don't create their flashes in your favorite way, you don't even care about how good the flash is itself. So what if it was predictable? Isn't that obvious? The creator obviously wanted us to focus on her. Do you think it would have been interesting if the woman lost? Obviously not. Who cares if it's cliche anime style, he can make whatever flash he wants. People like you don't understand how to review anything. We are supposed to rate the quality of the flash, not wether it's an interesting topic to us or not.